linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/19] powerpc/altivec: Add missing prototypes for altivec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:33:23 +0200
From:   LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Cc:     kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] powerpc/altivec: Add missing prototypes for
 altivec

LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr> a écrit :

> Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org> a écrit :
>
>> Christophe,
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:10 PM, LEROY Christophe
>> <christophe.leroy@....fr> wrote:
>>> Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org> a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 1:19 PM, christophe leroy
>>>> <christophe.leroy@....fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 22/03/2018 à 21:20, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some functions prototypes were missing for the non-altivec code. Add the
>>>>>> missing prototypes directly in xor_vmx, fix warnings treated as errors
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> W=1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:18:6: error: no previous prototype
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> ‘xor_altivec_2’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:29:6: error: no previous prototype
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> ‘xor_altivec_3’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:40:6: error: no previous prototype
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> ‘xor_altivec_4’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:52:6: error: no previous prototype
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> ‘xor_altivec_5’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h b/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h
>>>>>> index 5c2b0839b179..2173e3c84151 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h
>>>>>> @@ -19,3 +19,17 @@ void __xor_altivec_4(unsigned long bytes, unsigned
>>>>>> long
>>>>>> *v1_in,
>>>>>>  void __xor_altivec_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>>                             unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long *v3_in,
>>>>>>                             unsigned long *v4_in, unsigned long
>>>>>> *v5_in);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_2(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Only used in one place, should be static instead of adding it in a .h
>>>>>
>>>>> Same for the other ones.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> $ git grep xor_altivec_2
>>>> [...]
>>>> arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_altivec_2);
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure I can change this function to static ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes you are right.  But in fact those fonctions are already defined in
>>> asm/xor. h
>>> So you just need to add the missing #include
>>
>> I originally tried it, but this leads to:
>>
>>  CC      arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.o
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:16:0:
>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h:39:15: error: variable
>> ‘xor_block_altivec’ has initializer but incomplete type
>> static struct xor_block_template xor_block_altivec = {
>>               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h:40:2: error: unknown field ‘name’
>> specified in initializer
>>  .name = "altivec",
>>  ^
>> [...]
>>
>> The file <asm/xor.h> (powerpc) is pretty much expected to be included
>> after <include/linux/raid/xor.h>.
>>
>> I did not want to tweak <asm/xor.h> to test for #ifdef _XOR_H just before
>>
>> #ifdef _XOR_H
>> static struct xor_block_template xor_block_altivec = {
>> [...]
>>
>> since this seems like a hack to me.
>>
>> Is this ok to test for #ifdef _XOR_H in <arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h> ?
>
> What about including linux/raid/xor.h in asm/xor.h ?

Or better: including linux/raid/xor.h then asm/xor.h in xor_vmx_glue.c ?

Christophe
>
> Christophe
>>
>>> Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Christophe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_3(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long
>>>>>> *v3_in);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_4(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long *v3_in,
>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v4_in);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long *v3_in,
>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v4_in, unsigned long
>>>>>> *v5_in);
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
>>>>> logiciel antivirus Avast.
>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>
>>>
>>>