[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <346fdc4e-321b-33dc-3b6a-a2d3a0617743@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:05:50 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: wafer5823wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
On 03/27/2018 12:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "Fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
> index db0da7e..93c5b61 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static long wafwdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> timeout = new_timeout;
> wafwdt_stop();
> wafwdt_start();
> - /* Fall */
> + /* Fall through */
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(timeout, p);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists