linux-kernel - Re: Linux 3.18.102

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:31:49 +0900
From:   Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.18.102



On 2018년 03월 27일 16:05, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:40:33AM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Until 3.18.102, it looks like following patch series for v4l2 seems missed.
>>
>> 273caa2 media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: make ctrl_is_pointer work for subdevs
>> a1dfb4c media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: refactor compat ioctl32 logic
>> d83a824 media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: don't copy back the result for
>> certain errors
>> 169f24c media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: drop pr_info for unknown buffer type
>> a751be5 media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: copy clip list in put_v4l2_window32
>> b8c601e media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: fix ctrl_is_pointer
>> 8ed5a59 media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: copy m.userptr in put_v4l2_plane32
>> 333b1e9 media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: avoid sizeof(type)
>> 486c521 media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: move 'helper' functions to
>> __get/put_v4l2_format32
>> b7b957d media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: fix the indentation
>> 3ee6d04 media: v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c: add missing VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF
>> 181a4a2 media: v4l2-ioctl.c: don't copy back the result for -ENOTTY
> 
> That is correct.
> 
>> Any plan to apply the series?
> 
> Do you have a backported version of this series that will apply to that
> kernel tree?  If so, I'll be glad to apply it but I'm pretty sure the
> reason I did not apply them was because they did not apply correctly.

I dit not do it myself. I just checked the series is applied on other
stable trees.

> 
> Also, are you even sure you need these patches for 3.18.y?  Do you have
> a v4l2 device that relies on these fixes?

I've just expected A-34624167 is also fixed from other ARM64 devices
based on 3.18.y.

Best Regards,
- Seung-Woo Kim

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Seung-Woo Kim
Samsung Research
--