[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180327073834.GI2236@uranus>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:38:34 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
willy@...radead.org, adobriyan@...il.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
mguzik@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and
env_start|end in mm_struct
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 06:12:55PM -0400, Yang Shi wrote:
> > + if (unlikely(arg_start > arg_end || env_start > env_end)) {
> > + cond_resched();
> > + goto retry;
>
> Can't it trap into dead loop if the condition is always false?
Yes, unfortunately it can.
> > + }
> >
> > for reading these fields.
> >
> > By the way, /proc/pid/ readers are serving as a canary who tells something
> > mm_mmap related problem is happening. On the other hand, it is sad that
> > such canary cannot be terminated by signal due to use of unkillable waits.
> > I wish we can use killable waits.
>
> I already proposed patches (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/26/1197) to do this
> a few weeks ago. In the review, akpm suggested mitigate the mmap_sem
> contention instead of using killable version workaround. Then the
> preliminary unmaping by section patches
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/20/786) were proposed. In the discussion, we
> decided to eliminate the mmap_sem abuse, this is where the patch came from.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists