[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1522142993-25654-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:29:53 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-cadence: send tune request twice to work around errata
Cadence sent out an errata report to their customers of this IP.
This errata is not so severe, but the tune request should be sent
twice to avoid the potential issue.
Quote from the report:
Problem Summary
---------------
The IP6116 SD/eMMC PHY design has a timing issue on receive data path.
This issue may lead to an incorrect values of read/write pointers of
the synchronization FIFO. Such a situation can happen at the SDR104
and HS200 tuning procedure when the PHY is requested to change a phase
of sampling clock when moving to the next tuning iteration.
Workarounds
-----------
The following are valid workarounds to resolve the issue:
1. In eMMC mode, software sends tune request twice instead of once at
each iteration. This means that the clock phase is not changed on
the second request so there is no potential for clock instability.
2. In SD mode, software must not use the hardware tuning and instead
perform an almost identical procedure to eMMC, using the HRS34 Tune
Force register.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
index 0f589e2..bc30d16 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
@@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ static int sdhci_cdns_set_tune_val(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int val)
struct sdhci_cdns_priv *priv = sdhci_cdns_priv(host);
void __iomem *reg = priv->hrs_addr + SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06;
u32 tmp;
+ int i, ret;
if (WARN_ON(!FIELD_FIT(SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06_TUNE, val)))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -260,11 +261,24 @@ static int sdhci_cdns_set_tune_val(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int val)
tmp = readl(reg);
tmp &= ~SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06_TUNE;
tmp |= FIELD_PREP(SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06_TUNE, val);
- tmp |= SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06_TUNE_UP;
- writel(tmp, reg);
- return readl_poll_timeout(reg, tmp, !(tmp & SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06_TUNE_UP),
- 0, 1);
+ /*
+ * Workaround for IP errata:
+ * The IP6116 SD/eMMC PHY design has a timing issue on receive data
+ * path. Send tune request twice.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ tmp |= SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06_TUNE_UP;
+ writel(tmp, reg);
+
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(reg, tmp,
+ !(tmp & SDHCI_CDNS_HRS06_TUNE_UP),
+ 0, 1);
+
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static int sdhci_cdns_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists