[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180327093648.iba7rzvviolyjgmt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:36:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, msr: allow rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() to schedule
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 11:40 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > If performance matters then the relevant MSR events should be added and
> > > gsysd
> > > should be updated to support MSR events.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the hints Ingo. I have forwarded them.
> >
> > I am pretty sure gsysd was designed and written years before perf even
> > existed,
> > so I am not sure all this will ever be implemented.
> >
> > I guess I will apply the kernel patches locally for the time being.
>
> I'm still considering to merge them because there is no real reason not to
> do so. The interfaces exist and are used. Reducing their impact is
> certainly worthwhile.
Ok, that's a good point, and the patches themselves are sane:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists