linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/19] C-SKY(csky) Linux Kernel Port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180327015835.GA10185@guoren>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:58:36 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        c-sky_gcc_upstream@...ky.com, gnu-csky@...tor.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, wbx@...ibc-ng.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] C-SKY(csky) Linux Kernel Port

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Thanks for your submission. I had started reviewing it over a week
> ago, but never
> completed since I was travelling in the meantime. I've completed my first pass
> now and will wait for a new version before I take a more detailed look.
> 
> Overall, it looks nice, but changing the rest of the system call interface will
> take a while, this includes several points I've mentioned already, but
> to clarify,
> every file in arch/csky/include/uapi/asm/ needs to be carefully reviewed to
> contain only the minimum required additions to the asm-generic version.
> 
> Changing the ABI will obviously get in the way of testing, but this should
> be over as soon as the port is merged.
I entirely agree with you. After modify the unistd.h, we found a lot of
ltp-cases failed. We are dealing with them.

Best Regards
 Guo Ren