[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f35fb82a-d098-475c-4daf-cc2800a70c91@axentia.se>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:04:42 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm: bridge: add API to query the expected input
formats of bridges
On 2018-03-27 11:47, jacopo mondi wrote:
>> + * RETURNS:
>> + * The number of bus input formats the bridge accepts. Zero means that
>> + * the chain of bridges are not converting the bus format and that the
>> + * format of the drm_connector should be used.
>
> How do we get to the connector format from a bridge that has maybe
> other components in between in the pipeline?
Forgot to write something here in my previous reply, sorry...
The chain of bridges do not end with the connector in the in-kernel
representation, IIUC. So, I think it is up to the caller to find the
format desired by the connector. See patch [5/5] for an example.
Maybe the connector should be passed in as an argument?
Cheers,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists