[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c2cc31c-3701-3c37-6c81-cb226bc71e17@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 21:17:57 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] perf version: Print the status of compiled-in
libraries
On 3/27/2018 8:56 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:44:23AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/26/2018 5:39 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:07:03AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>>>> This patch checks the values passed by CFLAGS (-DXXX) and then
>>>> print the status of libraries.
>>>>
>>>> For example, if HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT is defined, that means the
>>>> library "dwarf" is compiled-in. The patch will print the status
>>>> "on" for this library.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/perf/builtin-version.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> tools/perf/builtin.h | 1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
>>>> index 37019c5..90a0a7f 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
>>>> @@ -9,3 +9,128 @@ int cmd_version(int argc __maybe_unused, const char **argv __maybe_unused)
>>>> printf("perf version %s\n", perf_version_string);
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> +static void status_print(const char *name, const char *status)
>>>> +{
>>>> + printf("%22s: [ %3s ]\n", name, status);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void library_status(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
>>>> + status_print("dwarf", "on");
>>>> +#else
>>>> + status_print("dwarf", "off");
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> could this and all those below be in some generic macro?
>>>
>>> #define STATUS(__d, __m) \
>>> #ifdef __d \
>>> status_print(#__m, "on"); \
>>> #else \
>>> status_print(#__m, "OFF"); \
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT, dwarf)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jiri,
>>
>> I have tried this macro definition, but unfortunately the compilation is
>> failed.
>>
>> error: '#' is not followed by a macro parameter
>> #define STATUS(__d, __m) \
>>
>> I just guess the '#' in #ifdef confuses the gcc. Looks we can't define
>> #ifdef/#endif block in a macro.
>>
>
> ah crap.. right ;-) how about we take the IS_BUILTIN thingie
> from include/linux/kconfig.h and use it as in attached test
> change.. it gives me:
>
> [jolsa@...va perf]$ ./perf version
> perf version 4.16.rc6.g1ee9a60
> dwarf: [ on ]
> krava: [ OFF ]
>
> we could put those macros into tools/include/tools/config.h, Arnaldo?
> together with the comments from kconfig.h that I cut out..
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
> index 1fe458792cc1..b392f9e80fd0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
> @@ -6,8 +6,33 @@
>
> int version_verbose;
>
> +
> +#define __ARG_PLACEHOLDER_1 0,
> +#define __take_second_arg(__ignored, val, ...) val
> +
> +#define __is_defined(x) ___is_defined(x)
> +#define ___is_defined(val) ____is_defined(__ARG_PLACEHOLDER_##val)
> +#define ____is_defined(arg1_or_junk) __take_second_arg(arg1_or_junk 1, 0)
> +
> +#define IS_BUILTIN(option) __is_defined(option)
> +
> +
> +static void status_print(const char *name, const char *status)
> +{
> + printf("%22s: [ %3s ]\n", name, status);
> +}
> +
> int cmd_version(int argc __maybe_unused, const char **argv __maybe_unused)
> {
> printf("perf version %s\n", perf_version_string);
> +
> +#define STATUS(__d, __m) \
> + if (IS_BUILTIN(__d)) \
> + status_print(#__m, "on"); \
> + else \
> + status_print(#__m, "OFF");
> +
> + STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT, dwarf)
> + STATUS(HAVE_KRAVA_SUPPORT, krava)
> return 0;
> }
>
Hi Jiri,
It looks we need to copy the IS_BUILTIN and associated macro definitions
to a common header file.
I guess you will post this patch if Arnaldo agree with this idea, right?
I plan to post v2 of this patch series after this 'IS_BUILTIN' patch
gets merged.
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists