[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP_NjxvPOM+y6d1mU6jcsnQENqjBeOnjhHGwwhOaEuscAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:27:10 +0200
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: KAMEI Hitoshi <hitoshi.kamei.xm@...achi.com>
Cc: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn>,
"sage@...hat.com" <sage@...hat.com>,
"elder@...nel.org" <elder@...nel.org>,
"ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rbd: RBD_DEV_FLAG_THICK rbd_dev_flags bit
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:44 AM, KAMEI Hitoshi
<hitoshi.kamei.xm@...achi.com> wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Thank you for reviewing.
> I merged two patches into one patch and pushed the new patch to GitHub.
> And I opened the PR. Could you check the PR?
>
> And I forgot to mention in previous email that I modified your patch to
> apply the latest kernel because I couldn't apply your patch directly
> by using git am command due to a little bit problem, and I tested
> the kernel with the modified patch and rbd map command with notrim option.
>
> The code described below is the modified patch by my hand.
Right, my patch is based on ceph/ceph-client.git:testing which has
some unrelated rbd_init_disk() changes.
Thanks,
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists