linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 101/101] bpf, x64: increase number of passes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180327162756.184401630@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:28:13 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 101/101] bpf, x64: increase number of passes

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

commit 6007b080d2e2adb7af22bf29165f0594ea12b34c upstream.

In Cilium some of the main programs we run today are hitting 9 passes
on x64's JIT compiler, and we've had cases already where we surpassed
the limit where the JIT then punts the program to the interpreter
instead, leading to insertion failures due to CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
or insertion failures due to the prog array owner being JITed but the
program to insert not (both must have the same JITed/non-JITed property).

One concrete case the program image shrunk from 12,767 bytes down to
10,288 bytes where the image converged after 16 steps. I've measured
that this took 340us in the JIT until it converges on my i7-6600U. Thus,
increase the original limit we had from day one where the JIT covered
cBPF only back then before we run into the case (as similar with the
complexity limit) where we trip over this and hit program rejections.
Also add a cond_resched() into the compilation loop, the JIT process
runs without any locks and may sleep anyway.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(str
 	 * may converge on the last pass. In such case do one more
 	 * pass to emit the final image
 	 */
-	for (pass = 0; pass < 10 || image; pass++) {
+	for (pass = 0; pass < 20 || image; pass++) {
 		proglen = do_jit(prog, addrs, image, oldproglen, &ctx);
 		if (proglen <= 0) {
 			image = NULL;
@@ -1183,6 +1183,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(str
 			}
 		}
 		oldproglen = proglen;
+		cond_resched();
 	}

 	if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)