linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.15 104/105] bpf: skip unnecessary capability check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180327162804.245578673@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:28:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.15 104/105] bpf: skip unnecessary capability check

4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>

commit 0fa4fe85f4724fff89b09741c437cbee9cf8b008 upstream.

The current check statement in BPF syscall will do a capability check
for CAP_SYS_ADMIN before checking sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled. This
code path will trigger unnecessary security hooks on capability checking
and cause false alarms on unprivileged process trying to get CAP_SYS_ADMIN
access. This can be resolved by simply switch the order of the statement
and CAP_SYS_ADMIN is not required anyway if unprivileged bpf syscall is
allowed.

Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf
 	union bpf_attr attr = {};
 	int err;
 
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled)
+	if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	err = check_uarg_tail_zero(uattr, sizeof(attr), size);