[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6166e140-b417-dd22-10cf-843db3958226@lechnology.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:48:47 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the
reset framework
Wasn't there a v4 already? Is this really v5 instead of v3?
On 03/27/2018 04:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> This series converts the only user of the handcoded, mach-specific reset
> routines in the davinci platform to using the reset framework.
>
> Patches 1-3 add necessary lookups/DT-properties.
Should I just squash the DT changes into my common-clock-v9 branch
since those patches haven't been picked up yet anyway? That will be
2 fewer patches to keep track of.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists