[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1522169571.12357.81.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:52:51 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH script] hwmon: Use octal not symbolic permissions
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 08:44 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 03/27/2018 04:48 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 03:28 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 03/27/2018 12:35 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 23:33 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > Since the hwmon subsystem has been labeled as both "obsolete" and "obscure",
[]
> > In what sense do you mean hwmon is obsolete?
[]
> _I_ did not say it was obsolete. It was described as obsolete by a maintainer
> of a different subsystem at a conference a couple of years ago. If I wasn't too
> lazy, I could try to find the presentation, but I don't see the point.
Then it seems you were just being obscure on purpose.
You wrote obsolete without context.
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists