[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180328100309.yig4d3bmml6jvodz@dell>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:03:09 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>, alexandre.torgue@...com,
benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, benjamin.gaignard@...com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/8] Add support for PWM input capture on STM32
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:04:31AM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> > This series adds support for capture to stm32-pwm driver.
> > Capture is based on DMAs.
> > - First two patches are precursor patches
> > - Subsequent two patches add support for requesting DMAs to MFD core
> > - Next three patches add support for capture to stm32-pwm driver
> > - This has been tested on stm32429i-eval board.
> >
> > ---
> > Resend v2:
> > - Add collected Acks
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Abstract DMA handling from child driver: move it to MFD core
> > - Rework pwm capture routines to adopt this change
> > - Comment on optional dma support, beautify DMAs probe
> >
> > Fabrice Gasnier (8):
> > pwm: stm32: fix, remove unused struct device
> > pwm: stm32: protect common prescaler for all channels
> > dt-bindings: mfd: stm32-timers: add support for dmas
> > mfd: stm32-timers: add support for dmas
> > pwm: stm32: add capture support
> > pwm: stm32: improve capture by tuning counter prescaler
> > pwm: stm32: use input prescaler to improve period capture
> > ARM: dts: stm32: Enable pwm3 input capture on stm32f429i-eval
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/stm32-timers.txt | 20 ++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts | 3 +
> > drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c | 215 +++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 276 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h | 39 +++
> > 5 files changed, 547 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> I can't apply patches 1-2 and 5-6 since they depend on patches 3-4 for
> which I'd need an Acked-by: from Lee if I'm to pick them up. Same goes
> for patch 7.
>
> By the looks of it there are minor conflicts with the MFD tree, but no
> major ones. Perhaps it'd be better for Lee to pick up 3-4 for v4.17-rc1
> and ack patch 7, then I can take the rest after v4.17-rc1?
Sounds like a faff.
Why don't I just pick them all up (except the ARM patch)?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists