linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ANDROID: binder: prevent transactions into own process.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB0TPYHAMmbW8Nfqxr94MyB_dR3zeE+5JtSGAadkaNaMyrD46Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:34:02 +0200
From:   Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ANDROID: binder: prevent transactions into own process.

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> What is different from "v2" you sent before this?  No change information
> from v1?

Sorry I messed this up - the first resend did not have "v2" in the
subject but did contain v2 change information, the second resend had
the v2 subject and did not contain the change information :( Either of
the last two patches is fine - it just used "target_proc" instead of
"target_node->proc".

>
> I'm totally confused as to which is the "latest" patch here :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h-