[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJUp6GaDtEKwg7_nOoyDEumZx0MTeW4cr_NFSbNxxa06Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 04:55:29 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/21] arm64: move GCC version check for
ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 to Kconfig
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> This becomes much neater in Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Is there a reason this doesn't have a cc-option test, or was this a
silent addition to the compiler? (And as such, should there be a
comment for this in the Kconfig?)
Regardless:
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists