[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180328131042.GL9275@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:10:42 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, adobriyan@...il.com,
willy@...radead.org, mguzik@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and
env_start|end in mm_struct
On Tue 27-03-18 21:52:17, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 02:38:11PM -0400, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > Why do we need to hold mmap_sem here and call find_vma, when only
> > > PR_SET_MM_ENV_END: is consuming it? I guess we can replace it wit the
> > > new lock and take the mmap_sem only for PR_SET_MM_ENV_END.
> >
> > Actually, I didn't think of why. It looks prctl_set_mm() checks if vma does
> > exist when it tries to set stack_start, argv_* and env_*, btw not only
> > env_end.
> >
> > Cyrill may be able to give us some hint since C/R is the main user of this
> > API.
>
> First and most important it makes code smaller. This prctl call is really
> rarely used. Of course we can optimize it, but as I said I would prefer
> to simply deprecate this old interface (and I gonne to do so once time
> permit).
Ohh, it would be really great if we can remove this thingy altogether. I
cannot say it has a wee bit of my sympathy.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists