linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] PCI: designware-ep: Make dw_pcie_ep_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44985f79-5240-b3d2-dd38-644a174357de@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:13:06 +0100
From:   Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>,
        "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
        "cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com" 
        <cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:     Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] PCI: designware-ep: Make dw_pcie_ep_set_bar()
 handle 64-bit BARs properly

Hi Niklas,

On 28/03/2018 12:50, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Since a 64-bit BAR consists of a BAR pair, we need to write to both
> BARs in the BAR pair to setup the BAR properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 5a0bb53c795c..571b90f88d84 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -138,8 +138,15 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> -	dw_pcie_writel_dbi2(pci, reg, size - 1);
> -	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg, flags);
> +	if (flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) {
> +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi2(pci, reg, lower_32_bits(size - 1));
> +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg, flags);
> +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi2(pci, reg + 4, upper_32_bits(size - 1));
> +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg + 4, 0);
> +	} else {
> +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi2(pci, reg, size - 1);
> +		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg, flags);
> +	}
>  	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
>  
>  	return 0;
> 

Seems good to me. :)

Reviewed-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>