[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180328132148.GN9275@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:21:48 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: always free inline data before resetting inode fork
during ifree
On Tue 27-03-18 19:54:35, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:06:37AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > So by no means the MM backports were reviewed by me. And considering how hard
> > it is to get any review for MM patches in general I strongly suspect that
> > others didn't review either.
> >
> > In general I am quite skeptical about the automagic backports
> > selections, to be honest. MM patches should be reasonably good at
> > selecting stable backports and adding more patches on top just risks
> > regressions.
>
> BTW other than suggesting we needing *actual review* of the MM patches, are
> there known unit tests which could be run as well? Thinking long term.
There are some in selftests but most fixes are quite hard to get a
specialized testcase for. Rememeber the MM is a pile of heuristics to
handle large scale of workloads.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists