[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR2101MB0917BA3BDBA187201A15F3D8CCA30@DM5PR2101MB0917.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:22:53 +0000
From: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Long Li <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Resend Patch 1/3] Vmbus: Add function to report available ring
buffer to write in total ring size percentage
Maybe best through greg's char-misc tree since it has generic hv code and sometime updates both network and scsi.
Alternatively, put common code through one tree, and hold off the network device change till next release.
-----Original Message-----
From: Long Li
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 3:43 PM
To: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>; Long Li <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; James E . J . Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Resend Patch 1/3] Vmbus: Add function to report available ring buffer to write in total ring size percentage
> Subject: Re: [Resend Patch 1/3] Vmbus: Add function to report available ring
> buffer to write in total ring size percentage
>
>
> Long,
>
> > Netvsc has a function to calculate how much ring buffer in percentage
> > is available to write. This function is also useful for storvsc and
> > other vmbus devices.
>
> What is the submission strategy for this series? Do you expect it to go
> through net or scsi? If the latter, I'll need an ack from davem.
Martin,
I hope this patch set goes through SCSI, because it's purpose is to improve storvsc.
If this strategy is not possible, I can resubmit the 1st two patches to net, and the 3rd patch to scsi after the 1st two are merged.
Long
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists