[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2afdb97d-eb07-031b-bb24-7166d011ee5b@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:12:02 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>,
<cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] PCI: endpoint: Setting 64-bit/prefetch bit is
invalid when IO is set
On Wednesday 28 March 2018 05:20 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> If flag PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO is set, also having any
> PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_* bit set is invalid.
>
> This sanity check is done in pci_epc_set_bar(), so that we don't need
> to do this sanity check in all epc->ops->set_bar() implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> index 109d75f0b7d2..40eea20d21f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> @@ -309,10 +309,13 @@ int pci_epc_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
> {
> int ret;
> unsigned long irq_flags;
> + int flags = epf_bar->flags;
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
> (epf_bar->barno == BAR_5 &&
> - epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))
> + flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ||
> + (flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO &&
> + flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK))
> return -EINVAL;
If possible I'd like this to be split. But otherwise
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
>
> if (!epc->ops->set_bar)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists