[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2337a50-a881-3303-10a7-b65d11f5b9cb@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:32:55 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>,
<cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] PCI: endpoint: Make sure that BAR_5 does not
have 64-bit flag set when clearing
On Wednesday 28 March 2018 05:20 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Since a 64-bit BAR consists of a BAR pair, and since there is no
> BAR after BAR_5, BAR_5 cannot be 64-bits wide.
>
> This sanity check is done in pci_epc_clear_bar(), so that we don't need
> to do this sanity check in all epc->ops->clear_bar() implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> ---
> Kishon made a review comment that he wanted this:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152161168226203
>
> Personally, I don't think that this check is needed,
> since pci_epc_set_bar() already does this check,
> and no one should modify the flags after pci_epc_set_bar()
> has been called.
>
> If everyone agrees, then this patch could be dropped.
>
> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> index eccc942043cb..b0ee42739c3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,9 @@ void pci_epc_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
> + (epf_bar->barno == BAR_5 &&
> + epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))
> return;
>
> if (!epc->ops->clear_bar)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists