[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180329134745.GA12958@lerouge>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:47:46 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] softirq: Remove __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:16:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 04:27:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > The last user of __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING has been converted to generic
> > per-cpu softirq mask. We can now remove this conditional.
>
> This seems like half a cleanup; who still has local_softirq_pending()
> after this?
Only s390 because it uses lowcore to store such cpu data.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists