linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 27/28] kcm: lock lower socket in kcm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180329175736.687245659@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Mar 2018 20:00:46 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+ea75c0ffcd353d32515f064aaebefc5279e6161e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 27/28] kcm: lock lower socket in kcm_attach

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>


[ Upstream commit 2cc683e88c0c993ac3721d9b702cb0630abe2879 ]

Need to lock lower socket in order to provide mutual exclusion
with kcm_unattach.

v2: Add Reported-by for syzbot

Fixes: ab7ac4eb9832e32a09f4e804 ("kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module")
Reported-by: syzbot+ea75c0ffcd353d32515f064aaebefc5279e6161e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/kcm/kcmsock.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
+++ b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
@@ -1375,24 +1375,32 @@ static int kcm_attach(struct socket *soc
 	struct list_head *head;
 	int index = 0;
 	struct strp_callbacks cb;
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 
 	csk = csock->sk;
 	if (!csk)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	lock_sock(csk);
+
 	/* Only allow TCP sockets to be attached for now */
 	if ((csk->sk_family != AF_INET && csk->sk_family != AF_INET6) ||
-	    csk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	    csk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP) {
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/* Don't allow listeners or closed sockets */
-	if (csk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN || csk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	if (csk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN || csk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	psock = kmem_cache_zalloc(kcm_psockp, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!psock)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!psock) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	psock->mux = mux;
 	psock->sk = csk;
@@ -1406,7 +1414,7 @@ static int kcm_attach(struct socket *soc
 	err = strp_init(&psock->strp, csk, &cb);
 	if (err) {
 		kmem_cache_free(kcm_psockp, psock);
-		return err;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	write_lock_bh(&csk->sk_callback_lock);
@@ -1418,7 +1426,8 @@ static int kcm_attach(struct socket *soc
 		write_unlock_bh(&csk->sk_callback_lock);
 		strp_done(&psock->strp);
 		kmem_cache_free(kcm_psockp, psock);
-		return -EALREADY;
+		err = -EALREADY;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	psock->save_data_ready = csk->sk_data_ready;
@@ -1454,7 +1463,10 @@ static int kcm_attach(struct socket *soc
 	/* Schedule RX work in case there are already bytes queued */
 	strp_check_rcv(&psock->strp);
 
-	return 0;
+out:
+	release_sock(csk);
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int kcm_attach_ioctl(struct socket *sock, struct kcm_attach *info)
@@ -1506,6 +1518,7 @@ static void kcm_unattach(struct kcm_psoc
 
 	if (WARN_ON(psock->rx_kcm)) {
 		write_unlock_bh(&csk->sk_callback_lock);
+		release_sock(csk);
 		return;
 	}