linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] sysctl: Add flags to support min/max range clamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180329185645.GQ30543@wotan.suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:56:45 +0000
From:   "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] sysctl: Add flags to support min/max range
 clamping

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 02:47:18PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 03/29/2018 02:15 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:39:19AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> On 03/16/2018 09:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:13:42PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>>> When the CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE flag is set in the ctl_table
> >>>> entry, any update from the userspace will be clamped to the given
> >>>> range without error if either the proc_dointvec_minmax() or the
> >>>> proc_douintvec_minmax() handlers is used.
> >>> I don't get it.  Why define a generic range flag when we can be mores specific and
> >>> you do that in your next patch. What's the point of this flag then?
> >>>
> >>>   Luis
> >> I was thinking about using the signed/unsigned bits as just annotations
> >> for ranges for future extension. For the purpose of this patchset alone,
> >> I can merge the three bits into just two.
> > Only introduce flags which you will actually use in the same patch series.
> >
> >   Luis
> 
> Yes, will do. Since the merge window is coming, should I wait until it
> is over to send out the new patch?

Probably best. May be too tight for review now if Linus spins out a release
this weekend.

  Luis