lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180330131707.21bc3845@archlinux>
Date:   Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:17:07 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Cc:     <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: fix channel
 configuration for differential channels

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:32:38 +0300
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com> wrote:

> When iterating through the channels, the index in the array is not the
> scan index. Added an xlate function to translate to the proper index.
> This will be used also for devicetree channel xlate
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
So, this is a fix for an existing bug?

Please move this to the front of your set (to make it easier to backport).
Describe the result of the bug as well.

Fixes tag would be good.

Thanks,

Jonathan


> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> index 4eff835..8729d65 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,27 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec at91_adc_channels[] = {
>  				+ AT91_SAMA5D2_DIFF_CHAN_CNT + 1),
>  };
>  
> +static int at91_adc_chan_xlate(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int chan)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++) {
> +		if (indio_dev->channels[i].scan_index == chan)
> +			return i;
> +	}
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct iio_chan_spec const *
> +at91_adc_chan_get(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int chan)
> +{
> +	int index = at91_adc_chan_xlate(indio_dev, chan);
> +
> +	if (index < 0)
> +		return NULL;
> +	return indio_dev->channels + index;
> +}
> +
>  static int at91_adc_configure_trigger(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool state)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> @@ -350,8 +371,10 @@ static int at91_adc_configure_trigger(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool state)
>  	at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_SAMA5D2_TRGR, status);
>  
>  	for_each_set_bit(bit, indio->active_scan_mask, indio->num_channels) {
> -		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan = indio->channels + bit;
> +		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan = at91_adc_chan_get(indio, bit);
>  
> +		if (!chan)
> +			continue;
>  		if (state) {
>  			at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_SAMA5D2_CHER,
>  					BIT(chan->channel));
> @@ -448,7 +471,11 @@ static int at91_adc_dma_start(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  
>  	for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>  			 indio_dev->num_channels) {
> -		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan = indio_dev->channels + bit;
> +		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan =
> +					 at91_adc_chan_get(indio_dev, bit);
> +
> +		if (!chan)
> +			continue;
>  
>  		st->dma_st.rx_buf_sz += chan->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
>  	}
> @@ -526,8 +553,11 @@ static int at91_adc_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  	 */
>  	for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>  			 indio_dev->num_channels) {
> -		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan = indio_dev->channels + bit;
> +		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan =
> +					at91_adc_chan_get(indio_dev, bit);
>  
> +		if (!chan)
> +			continue;
>  		if (st->dma_st.dma_chan)
>  			at91_adc_readl(st, chan->address);
>  	}
> @@ -587,8 +617,11 @@ static void at91_adc_trigger_handler_nodma(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  
>  	for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>  			 indio_dev->num_channels) {
> -		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan = indio_dev->channels + bit;
> +		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan =
> +					at91_adc_chan_get(indio_dev, bit);
>  
> +		if (!chan)
> +			continue;
>  		st->buffer[i] = at91_adc_readl(st, chan->address);
>  		i++;
>  	}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ