linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.126-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuO+jDmTi8fH+rTqe6EEM6zrVZt5eBXVTNWW+YAvu5nKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Mar 2018 21:14:32 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.126-stable review

On 30 March 2018 at 14:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 08:00:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.126 release.
>> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sat Mar 31 17:57:30 UTC 2018.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.126-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> There is a -rc2 out to fix a reported issue:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.126-rc2.gz
>

RC2 looks good to me :)

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.4.126-rc2
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.4.y
git commit: cc5630ae66b26ccb8675849f0ce819db3cd2077f
git describe: v4.4.125-21-gcc5630ae66b2
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.125-21-gcc5630ae66b2


No regressions (compared to build v4.4.125-21-g958176572b0c)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-------------------------------------

juno-r2 - arm64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - skip: 29, pass: 34
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 53, pass: 28
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 2, pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 4, pass: 10
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 152, pass: 998
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

qemu_x86_64
* boot - pass: 22
* kselftest - skip: 33, pass: 47
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native - skip: 33, pass: 47
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none - skip: 33, pass: 47
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 6, pass: 57
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 149, pass: 1001
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - skip: 29, pass: 33
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 87
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 2, pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - skip: 2, pass: 20
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 98, pass: 1052
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

x86_64
* boot - pass: 22
* kselftest - skip: 31, fail: 1, pass: 48
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native - skip: 31, fail: 1, pass: 48
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none - skip: 31, fail: 2, pass: 46
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - skip: 17, pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, pass: 62
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 5, pass: 9
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 120, pass: 1030
* ltp-timers-tests - skip: 1, pass: 12

--
Linaro QA (beta)
https://qa-reports.linaro.org