[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3cdc23a2-99eb-6f93-6934-f7757fa30a3e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:26:14 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, namit@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI
On 03/30/2018 05:17 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> BTW., the expectation on !PCID Intel hardware would be for global pages to help
> even more than the 0.6% and 1.7% you measured on PCID hardware: PCID already
> _reduces_ the cost of TLB flushes - so if there's not even PCID then global pages
> should help even more.
>
> In theory at least. Would still be nice to measure it.
I did the lseek test on a modern, non-PCID system:
No Global pages (baseline): 6077741 lseeks/sec
94 Global pages (this set): 8433111 lseeks/sec
+2355370 lseeks/sec (+38.8%)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists