[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152261531188.30503.1879167170677309447.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:41:51 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 16/45] C++: Disable VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS() for the moment
Disable VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS() for the moment as it's unclear as to why
g++ doesn't like it.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index 59089f76c7d8..06b7e3a79c7a 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -931,15 +931,6 @@ static inline void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode) { }
#endif
/* Permissions on a sysfs file: you didn't miss the 0 prefix did you? */
-#define VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perms) \
- (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) < 0) + \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) > 0777) + \
- /* USER_READABLE >= GROUP_READABLE >= OTHER_READABLE */ \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 6) & 4) < (((perms) >> 3) & 4)) + \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 3) & 4) < ((perms) & 4)) + \
- /* USER_WRITABLE >= GROUP_WRITABLE */ \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 6) & 2) < (((perms) >> 3) & 2)) + \
- /* OTHER_WRITABLE? Generally considered a bad idea. */ \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) & 2) + \
- (perms))
+#define VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perms) \
+ (perms)
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists