[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1522616201.2654.79.camel@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:56:41 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 092/134] cpufreq: Fix governor module removal race
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 19:06 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
>
> [ Upstream commit a8b149d32b663c1a4105273295184b78f53d33cf ]
[...]
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *
> *governor = t;
> err = 0;
> }
> + if (t && !try_module_get(t->owner))
> + t = NULL;
This won't work because t is dead after this point. The fix appears to
depend on:
commit 045149e6a22119e5bf0d16a0b24a4173a2abb71d
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Date: Thu Nov 23 01:23:16 2017 +0100
cpufreq: Clean up cpufreq_parse_governor()
which moves the assignment to *governor further down.
Ben.
> mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
> }
> @@ -669,6 +671,10 @@ static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(st
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
> +
> + if (new_policy.governor)
> + module_put(new_policy.governor->owner);
> +
> return ret ? ret : count;
> }
>
--
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists