[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180402081233.GA38180@WeideMacBook-Pro.local>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:12:33 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn()
when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 05:49:23PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
>
>
>On 3/28/2018 5:18 PM, Wei Yang Wrote:
>> Oops, I should reply this thread. Forget about the reply on another thread.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 08:02:15PM -0700, Jia He wrote:
>> > Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
>> > where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But it causes
>> > possible panic bug. So Daniel Vacek reverted it later.
>> >
>> Why this has a bug? Do you have some link about it?
>>
>> If the audience could know the potential risk, it would be helpful to review
>> the code and decide whether to take it back.
>Hi Wei
>Paul firstly submit a commit b92df1de5 to improve the loop in
>memmap_init_zone.
>And Daniel tried to fix a bug_on panic issue on X86 in commit 864b75f9d6b
>because
>there is evidence that this bug_on was caused by b92df1de5 [1].
>
>But things didn't get better, 864b75f9d6b caused booting hang issue on
>arm{64} [2]
>So maintainer decided to reverted both b92df1de5 and 864b75f9d6b
>
>[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10251145/
>[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/14/469
I took some time to look into the discussion, while the root cause seems not
clear now?
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists