lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <41088460-11f1-1ec7-2bfa-1ebdf675dc17@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 04:45:36 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> To: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>, Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>, Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] About 9pfs support "O_DIRECT + aio"? On 30/03/2018 10:53, jiangyiwen wrote: > Currently, I found virtio-9p in VirtFS don't support "O_DIRECT + aio" > mode, both v9fs and qemu. So when user use "O_DIRECT + aio" mode and > increase iodepths, they can't get higher IOPS. > > I want to know why v9fs don't implement this mode? And I will try to > implement this mode from now on. Can you explain? I think 9p has support for direct I/O in Linux. See v9fs_direct_IO in fs/9p/vfs_addr.c. Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists