linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] arch: remove obsolete architecture ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzmQ9specaytsjEb=iNm-NHE5kxMSy_H_jKvqZa4-Fomw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:57:05 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        linux-am33-list@...hat.com,
        Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
        Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
        Aaron Wu <Aaron.Wu@...log.com>, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
        Chris Metcalf <chris.d.metcalf@...il.com>,
        Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch: remove obsolete architecture ports

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> (dirstat only for brevity)

Shortlog?

I'd like to see that each architecture removal is independent of the
others, so that if somebody wants to resurrect any particular
architecture, he/she can do so with a revert.

Can I just fetch things and see? Sure. But there's no excuse not to
have a shortlog in the pull request, even if the full diffstat itself
might be prohibitive.

                Linus