lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a18770ce-9c53-5b02-b259-bba149883187@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 1 Apr 2018 21:49:56 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Anton Gary Ceph <agaceph@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: improve ipv4 performances



On 04/01/2018 11:31 AM, Anton Gary Ceph wrote:
> As the Linux networking stack is growing, more and more protocols are
> added, increasing the complexity of stack itself.
> Modern processors, contrary to common belief, are very bad in branch
> prediction, so it's our task to give hints to the compiler when possible.
> 
> After a few profiling and analysis, turned out that the ethertype field
> of the packets has the following distribution:
> 
>     92.1% ETH_P_IP
>      3.2% ETH_P_ARP
>      2.7% ETH_P_8021Q
>      1.4% ETH_P_PPP_SES
>      0.6% don't know/no opinion
> 
> From a projection on statistics collected by Google about IPv6 adoption[1],
> IPv6 should peak at 25% usage at the beginning of 2030. Hence, we should
> give proper hints to the compiler about the low IPv6 usage.
> 
> Here is an iperf3 run before and after the patch:
> 
> Before:
> [ ID]  Interval           Transfer    Bandwidth       Retr
> [  4]  0.00-100.00 sec    100 GBytes  8.60 Gbits/sec  0       sender
> [  4]  0.00-100.00 sec    100 GBytes  8.60 Gbits/sec          receiver
> 
> After
> [ ID]  Interval           Transfer    Bandwidth       Retr
> [  4]  0.00-100.00 sec    109 GBytes  9.35 Gbits/sec  0       sender
> [  4]  0.00-100.00 sec    109 GBytes  9.35 Gbits/sec          receiver
>

These iperf3 numbers are simply telling something is wrong in your measures or your hardware.

By the time linux kernels with this patch reach hosts, they will likely use IPv6 anyway.

Please do not tell the compiler that IPv6 should be slowed down in favor of IPv4.

Instead, work on removing IPv4 stack from linux kernel (making it a module)



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ