linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] bus: fsl-mc: add bus rescan attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180403070455.GA16002@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:04:55 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Cc:     Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stuyoder@...il.com" <stuyoder@...il.com>,
        Ruxandra Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        Razvan Stefanescu <razvan.stefanescu@....com>,
        Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] bus: fsl-mc: add bus rescan attribute

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 01:46:13PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> > > Introduce the rescan attribute as a bus attribute to synchronize the
> > > fsl-mc bus objects and the MC firmware.
> > >
> > > To rescan the fsl-mc bus, e.g.,
> > > echo 1 > /sys/bus/fsl-mc/rescan
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >   - added proper documentation in /Documentation/ABI/
> > >   - updated the MAINTAINERS file
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >   - no change
> > >
> > >  Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-fsl-mc |  7 +++++
> > >  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c           | 48
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-fsl-mc
> > > b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-fsl-mc
> > > index e530e8c..0663fbd 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-fsl-mc
> > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-fsl-mc
> > > @@ -4,3 +4,10 @@ KernelVersion:	4.16
> > >  Contact:	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> > >  Description:	Root dprc rescan attribute
> > >  Users:		Userspace drivers and management tools
> > > +
> > > +What:		/sys/bus/fsl-mc/rescan
> > > +Date:		March. 2018
> > > +KernelVersion:	4.16
> > 
> > Same comments as previous review.
> > 
> > > +Contact:	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> > > +Description:	Bus rescan attribute
> > 
> > Again, describe this better please.
> > 
> > > +Users:		Userspace drivers and management tools
> > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> > > b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c index 9d02984..80010d1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> > > @@ -172,11 +172,59 @@ static ssize_t rescan_store(struct device *dev,
> > >
> > >  ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fsl_mc_dev);
> > >
> > > +static int scan_fsl_mc_bus(struct device *dev, void *data) {
> > > +	struct fsl_mc_device *root_mc_dev;
> > > +	struct fsl_mc_bus *root_mc_bus;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(dev))
> > > +		goto exit;
> > > +
> > > +	root_mc_dev = to_fsl_mc_device(dev);
> > > +	root_mc_bus = to_fsl_mc_bus(root_mc_dev);
> > > +	mutex_lock(&root_mc_bus->scan_mutex);
> > > +	dprc_scan_objects(root_mc_dev, NULL);
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&root_mc_bus->scan_mutex);
> > > +
> > > +exit:
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static ssize_t bus_rescan_store(struct bus_type *bus,
> > > +				const char *buf, size_t count)
> > > +{
> > > +	unsigned long val;
> > > +
> > > +	if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val) < 0)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (val)
> > > +		bus_for_each_dev(bus, NULL, NULL, scan_fsl_mc_bus);
> > > +
> > > +	return count;
> > > +}
> > > +static BUS_ATTR(rescan, 0220, NULL, bus_rescan_store);
> > 
> > BUS_ATTR_RO()?
> > 
> > 
> 
> Since this is a write-only attribute, a BUS_ATTR_WO would be needed but there is no WO macro defined.

Oops, yes.  We can easily fix that :)

thanks,

greg k-h