[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1522743506.5089.4.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:18:26 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: uniphier: add SATA reset control support and
change SATA-PHY ID
On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 18:44 +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> Add reset lines for SATA controller on UniPhier SoCs.
> This adds support for Pro4 and PXs3 in addition to PXs2.
>
> And this changes the ID of the reset line for SATA-PHY on PXs2.
> Since some SoCs have two controller instances with a common PHY, this moves
> the ID of SATA-PHY for consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> ---
> drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
> index 55ae0f1..90e6caf 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_pro4_sys_reset_data[] = {
> UNIPHIER_RESETX(12, 0x2000, 6), /* GIO (Ether, SATA, USB3) */
> UNIPHIER_RESETX(14, 0x2000, 17), /* USB30 */
> UNIPHIER_RESETX(15, 0x2004, 17), /* USB31 */
> + UNIPHIER_RESETX(28, 0x2000, 18), /* SATA0 */
> + UNIPHIER_RESETX(29, 0x2004, 18), /* SATA1 */
> + UNIPHIER_RESETX(30, 0x2000, 19), /* SATA-PHY */
> UNIPHIER_RESETX(40, 0x2000, 13), /* AIO */
> UNIPHIER_RESET_END,
> };
> @@ -90,7 +93,7 @@ static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_pxs2_sys_reset_data[] = {
> UNIPHIER_RESETX(20, 0x2014, 5), /* USB31-PHY0 */
> UNIPHIER_RESETX(21, 0x2014, 1), /* USB31-PHY1 */
> UNIPHIER_RESETX(28, 0x2014, 12), /* SATA */
> - UNIPHIER_RESET(29, 0x2014, 8), /* SATA-PHY (active high) */
> + UNIPHIER_RESET(30, 0x2014, 8), /* SATA-PHY (active high) */
This is a backwards incompatible change.
There is no DT in use that relies on this being 29 ?
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists