[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v67EzOHd5_Xj9K3ZuAKVZhA4WrwfTM0gE_eR+H4mF1J4eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:48:41 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
quentin.schulz@...tlin.com, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] ARM: sun9i: smp: Add is_sun9i field
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:18:34AM +0200, Mylène Josserand wrote:
>> To prepare the support of sun8i-a83t, add a field in the smp_data
>> structure to enable the case of sun9i.
>>
>> Start to handle the differences between sun9i-a80 and sun8i-a83t
>> by using this variable.
>>
>> Add an index to retrieve which structures we are using.
>
> This should have been in a separate commit, but maybe we can store a
> pointer to the array cell we're using instead of always using the
> index?
Using a pointer would also avoid some of the code movement from the
previous patch.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists