[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3b41806-dc12-3af9-8b3a-bd1a611293f8@orpaltech.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:26:34 +0300
From: Sergey Suloev <ssuloev@...altech.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] spi: sun4i: restrict transfer length in PIO-mode
On 04/03/2018 11:10 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:59:03PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
>> There is no need to handle 3/4 empty/full interrupts as the maximum
>> supported transfer length in PIO mode is 64 bytes for sun4i-family
>> SoCs.
> That assumes that you'll be able to treat the FIFO full interrupt and
> drain the FIFO before we have the next byte coming in. This would
> require a real time system, and we're not in one of them.
>
> Maxime
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
so you think we should still handle 3/4 FIFO full ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists