[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180403113837.GK16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:38:37 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Abbott Liu <liuwenliang@...wei.com>, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
dvyukov@...gle.com, corbet@....net, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
pombredanne@...b.com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
vladimir.murzin@....com, alexander.levin@...izon.com,
nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de, thgarnie@...gle.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org, arnd@...db.de,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, tixy@...aro.org, julien.thierry@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, james.morse@....com,
zhichao.huang@...aro.org, jinb.park7@...il.com, labbott@...hat.com,
philip@....systems, grygorii.strashko@...aro.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, opendmb@...il.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] Disable instrumentation for some code
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:30:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 02/04/18 13:04, Abbott Liu wrote:
> > From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
> >
> > Disable instrumentation for arch/arm/boot/compressed/*
> > ,arch/arm/kvm/hyp/* and arch/arm/vdso/* because those
> > code won't linkd with kernel image.
> >
> > Disable kasan check in the function unwind_pop_register
> > because it doesn't matter that kasan checks failed when
> > unwind_pop_register read stack memory of task.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>
> Just because I replied to this patch doesn't mean you can stick my
> Reviewed-by tag on it. Please drop this tag until I explicitly say that
> you can add it (see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst,
> section 11).
>
> Same goes for patch 1.
Same goes for that reviewed-by line for me. From my records, I never
even looked at patch 2 from the first posting, and I don't appear to
have the second posting in my mailbox (it's probably been classed as
spam by dspam.) So these reviewed-by lines seem to be totally
misleading.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists