linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] siginfo fix for v4.16-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4A16C7EF-B8B7-457C-B49C-829B44F12FFE@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:24:58 -0400
From:   Josh Juran <jjuran@...il.com>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] siginfo fix for v4.16-rc5

On Apr 3, 2018, at 10:27 AM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:

> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:17 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> A 2-byte alignment for 4 byte pointers.  That is a new one to me.
>> 
>> Not just for pointers, also for int and long.
> 
> The smallest I have seen previously has been 64bit integers having
> 32bit alignment.  32bit entities having only 16bit alignment on a 32bit
> arch was simply a surprise.  Even when it works there tend to be good
> reasons not to do that by default.

The 68K architecture began as 16-bit with the 68000.  Rather than tightening requirements, the 68020 not only maintained compatibility with 16-bit alignment, but also forgave byte-misaligned data accesses (albeit with a performance penalty).  Jumping to an odd address is still an error, though.

Josh