[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1dcbd33a-09e8-89fa-8cae-011e80b3ceb8@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 22:09:43 +0530
From: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Ilia Lin <ilialin@...eaurora.org>, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org,
celster@...eaurora.org, tfinkel@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Document
operating-points-v2-kryo-cpu
Hi Viresh,
On 4/3/2018 9:53 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 03-04-18, 08:11, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Right, i was adding a similar one for krait cores [1]. There is code common in the
>> init sequence across both (little). Do you suggest to make them common ?
>
> It may make sense as we are talking about one SoC family here :)
>
ok. So either of us can merge, depending upon which one goes first.
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists