[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+vNU31f+iY5LOG6QmdJetb=pPvY_gpKoS+49FSy70U1Ksd8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:29:44 -0700
From: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] mfd: add Gateworks System Controller core driver
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:48:27AM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com> wrote:
>> > The Gateworks System Controller (GSC) is an I2C slave controller
>> > implemented with an MSP430 micro-controller whose firmware embeds the
>> > following features:
>> > - I/O expander (16 GPIO's) using PCA955x protocol
>> > - Real Time Clock using DS1672 protocol
>> > - User EEPROM using AT24 protocol
>> > - HWMON using custom protocol
>> > - Interrupt controller with tamper detect, user pushbotton
>> > - Watchdog controller capable of full board power-cycle
>> > - Power Control capable of full board power-cycle
>> >
>> > see http://trac.gateworks.com/wiki/gsc for more details
>> >
>> <snip>
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * gsc_powerdown - API to use GSC to power down board for a specific time
>> > + *
>> > + * secs - number of seconds to remain powered off
>> > + */
>> > +static int gsc_powerdown(struct gsc_dev *gsc, unsigned long secs)
>> > +{
>> > + int ret;
>> > + unsigned char regs[4];
>> > +
>> > + dev_info(&gsc->i2c->dev, "GSC powerdown for %ld seconds\n",
>> > + secs);
>> > + regs[0] = secs & 0xff;
>> > + regs[1] = (secs >> 8) & 0xff;
>> > + regs[2] = (secs >> 16) & 0xff;
>> > + regs[3] = (secs >> 24) & 0xff;
>> > + ret = regmap_bulk_write(gsc->regmap, GSC_TIME_ADD, regs, 4);
>> > +
>> > + return ret;
>> > +}
>>
>> Any feedback on the 'powerdown' sysfs attribute that hooks to this
>> function? This allows the GSC to disable the board primary power
>> supply for 2^32 seconds and is often used to 'reset' the board
>> although it could also be used to put the board in a power down state
>> longer. I'm wondering if there is a more appropriate API for this in
>> the kernel that I don't know about.
>
> Hi Tim
>
> RTC can cause wakeup when an alarm is set. It looks like the DS1672
> does not have this. But you are emulating the DS1672 right? You could
> add a second emulated RTC which does support an alarm? DS3232?
Andrew,
Thanks for the response!
An RTC alarm may indeed be a good route for the overall sleep
functionality I will look into that.
What about the 'reset' functionality? Is there something in the power
supply API for hooking in a GPIO based power switch (in my case it
would be i2c) as I would think that would be common for ATX supplies?
I didn't see anything in Documentation/power.
This is what led me to the restart handler idea. Ultimately when
someone issues a 'reboot' I would like it to use the GSC to
power-cycle the board.
>
>> I would also like to register a restart handler using this but I
>> believe that ARM restart handlers currently can not use I2C - is that
>> correct?
>
> There are plenty which use GPIOs, or UARTs. Not seen any which use
> i2c. What do you think does not work at this point?
I'll have to dig around for the e-mail thread. I recall someone else
trying to implement a restart handler for something hanging off i2c
and the issue was that by the time the (ARM) restart handler got
called interrupts were disabled making i2c unreliable. I have hooked
the ARM restart handler to my GSC powerdown in some kernels and have
had mixed results. When the handler gets called from a clean 'reboot'
things seem fine but if its called from some error condition that
halts the kernel it seems that i2c may not be reliable anymore.
Regards,
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists