[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a117d9a-f005-e1ae-5632-25e5c61dcb8f@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:51:04 -0700
From: Nagarathnam Muthusamy <nagarathnam.muthusamy@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
serge.hallyn@...ntu.com, oleg@...hat.com, luto@...capital.net,
jannh@...gle.com, prakash.sangappa@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V4] pidns: introduce syscall translate_pid
On 04/03/2018 02:52 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:45:28 -0700 Nagarathnam Muthusamy <nagarathnam.muthusamy@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>>> This changelog doesn't explain what the value is to our users. I
>>> assume it is a performance optimization because "backward translation
>>> requires scanning all tasks"? If so, please show us real-world
>>> examples of the performance benefit from this patch, and please go to
>>> great lengths to explain to us why this optimisation is needed by our
>>> users.
>> One of the usecase by Oracle database involves multiple levels of
>> nested pid namespaces and we require pid translation between the
>> levels. Discussions on the particular usecase, why any of the existing
>> methods was not usable happened in the following thread.
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10276785/
>>
>> At the end, it was agreed that this patch along with flocks will solve the
>> issue.
> Nobody who reads this patch's changelog will know any of this. Please
> let's get all this information into the proper place.
Sure! Will resend the patch with updated change log.
Thanks,
Nagarathnam.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists