[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180403164522.657185a44e8ada1b741f0a9e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:45:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: properly preserve write attribute in
special migrate entry
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:03:36 -0400 Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
> > That sounds a bit serious. Was a -stable backport considered?
>
> Like discuss previously with Michal, for lack of upstream user yet
> (and PowerPC users of this code are not upstream either yet AFAIK).
>
> Once i get HMM inside nouveau upstream, i will evaluate if people
> wants all fixes to be back ported to stable.
>
> Finaly this one isn't too bad, it just burn CPU cycles by forcing
> CPU to take a second fault on write access ie double fault the same
> address. There is no corruption or incorrect states (it behave as
> a COWed page from a fork with a mapcount of 1).
OK, I updated the changelog with this info.
> Do you still want me to be more aggressive with stable backport ?
> I don't mind either way. I expect to get HMM nouveau upstream over
> next couple release cycle.
I guess that doing a single, better-organized cherrypick at a suitable
time in the future is a good approach. You might want to discuss this
plan with Greg before committing too far.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists