[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180403061836.3926-11-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 08:18:33 +0200
From: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com>
To: linux@...linux.org.uk, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com, wens@...e.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, clabbe.montjoie@...il.com,
quentin.schulz@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
mylene.josserand@...tlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/13] ARM: sun9i: smp: Move structures
To prepare the support for sun8i-a83t, move some structures
at the beginning of the file.
Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
index 03f021d0c73e..0a7252df207f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
@@ -72,9 +72,34 @@ static void __iomem *cpucfg_base;
static void __iomem *prcm_base;
static void __iomem *sram_b_smp_base;
+/*
+ * This holds any device nodes that we requested resources for,
+ * so that we may easily release resources in the error path.
+ */
+struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes {
+ struct device_node *prcm_node;
+ struct device_node *cpucfg_node;
+ struct device_node *sram_node;
+};
+
+/* This structure holds SoC-specific bits tied to an enable-method string. */
+struct sunxi_mc_smp_data {
+ const char *enable_method;
+ int (*get_smp_nodes)(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes);
+};
+
extern void sunxi_mc_smp_secondary_startup(void);
extern void sunxi_mc_smp_resume(void);
+static int __init sun9i_a80_get_smp_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes);
+
+static const struct sunxi_mc_smp_data sunxi_mc_smp_data[] __initconst = {
+ {
+ .enable_method = "allwinner,sun9i-a80-smp",
+ .get_smp_nodes = sun9i_a80_get_smp_nodes,
+ },
+};
+
static bool sunxi_core_is_cortex_a15(unsigned int core, unsigned int cluster)
{
struct device_node *node;
@@ -610,22 +635,6 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_loopback(void)
return ret;
}
-/*
- * This holds any device nodes that we requested resources for,
- * so that we may easily release resources in the error path.
- */
-struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes {
- struct device_node *prcm_node;
- struct device_node *cpucfg_node;
- struct device_node *sram_node;
-};
-
-/* This structure holds SoC-specific bits tied to an enable-method string. */
-struct sunxi_mc_smp_data {
- const char *enable_method;
- int (*get_smp_nodes)(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes);
-};
-
static void __init sunxi_mc_smp_put_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes)
{
of_node_put(nodes->prcm_node);
@@ -660,13 +669,6 @@ static int __init sun9i_a80_get_smp_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes)
return 0;
}
-static const struct sunxi_mc_smp_data sunxi_mc_smp_data[] __initconst = {
- {
- .enable_method = "allwinner,sun9i-a80-smp",
- .get_smp_nodes = sun9i_a80_get_smp_nodes,
- },
-};
-
static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void)
{
struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes nodes = { 0 };
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists