[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:00:54 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Multiple generic PHY instances for DWC3 USB IP
Hi,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> writes:
>>> Each DWC3 instance is connected with
>>> multiple HS PHYs and multiple SS PHYs,
>>> depending on the number of ports.
>>
>> in that case, you shouldn't need dwc3 at all. A Host-only dwc3 is xHCI
>> compliant. If you really don't have the gadget block, there's no need
>> for you to use dwc3. Just use xhci-plat directly.
>
> Sorry, I was misunderstanding.
>
> Some of our SoCs support gadget,
> so we need to use the dwc3 driver.
fair enough. Now we need to figure out how to pass multiply PHYs to a
multi-port dwc3 instance.
Kishon, any ideas? How do you think DT should look like?
--
balbi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists