[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:16:42 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@....com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915:Do not use kfree() to free kmem_cache_alloc() return value
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018, Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@....com> wrote:
> In eb_lookup_vmas(), lut, the return value of kmem_cache_alloc(), is freed
> with kfree().I think the expected paired function is kmem_cache_free().
Agreed. But did you try to compile your patch before sending?
Fixes: d1b48c1e7184 ("drm/i915: Replace execbuf vma ht with an idr")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.14+
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xidong Wang <wangxidong_97@....com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 8c170db..08fe476 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>
> err = radix_tree_insert(handles_vma, handle, vma);
> if (unlikely(err)) {
> - kfree(lut);
> + kmem_cache_free(lut);
> goto err_obj;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists