lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:24:26 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: atmel_ssc_dai: fix spelling mistake:
 "Stoping" -> "Stopping"

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:45:40PM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 04:44:20PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Hello Colin,
> 
> > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in pr_debug message text
> 
> would you mind making this patch a bit less non-trivial and
> change pr_debug to dev_dbg dropping Atmel_ssc_dai prefix?
> 
> Thank you.
>

Trivial patches should just be trivial instead of evolving into a thread
that lasts for days.

I sometimes write trivial clean up patches for things like:

arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c:97 do_csum() warn: inconsistent indenting
    88                          /* last up to 7 8byte blocks */
    89                          count %= 8; 
    90                          while (count) { 
    91                                  asm("addq %1,%0\n\t"
    92                                      "adcq %2,%0\n" 
    93                                              : "=r" (result)
    94                                      : "m" (*(unsigned long *)buff), 
    95                                      "r" (zero),  "0" (result));
    96                                  --count; 
    97                                          buff += 8;
    98                          }

Why is "buff += 8;" indented too far?  And why does every line end in a
space character?  And I think about it for 10 minutes and then delete my
patch because it's too much hassle to deal with for something small.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ