linux-kernel - Re: 答复: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: new centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:18:22 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     David Wang <DavidWang@...oxin.com>
Cc:     "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Bruce Chang (VAS)" <BruceChang@...-alliance.com>,
        "Cooper Yan(BJ-RD)" <CooperYan@...oxin.com>,
        "Qiyuan Wang(BJ-RD)" <QiyuanWang@...oxin.com>,
        Benjamin Pan <BenjaminPan@...tech.com>,
        Luke Lin <LukeLin@...cpu.com>,
        "Tim Guo(BJ-RD)" <TimGuo@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: new
 centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting

On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 02:34:52AM +0000, David Wang wrote:
> Those are new processors and main usage of CentaurHauls CPUs in recent
> years is for limited and/or embedded instead of distribution markets.
> So there is no plan or resource to create such document for public
> access. Is public spec mandatory for code check-in? We can provide
> platforms for verification instead.

Nah, not needed. As long as the code paths don't break anything else and
as long as we can CC you to fix bugs people report, we're good. :-)

Btw, please do not top-post on a public ML.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.